Posts

Showing posts with the label Process Theories

Serial Entrepreneurship

Image
  Serial entrepreneurship refers to the repeated behaviours of entrepreneur.     “There are two types of entrepreneurs: novice entrepreneurs, who launch a business for the first time, and habitual entrepreneurs, which include serial entrepreneurs, who launch businesses sequentially, and portfolio entrepreneurs, who run multiple businesses concurrently.” ( Plehn-Dujowich, 2010)   Plehn-Dujowich suggests that serial entrepreneurs differ substantially from first time entrepreneurs. They argue that the serial entrepreneurs develop new capabilities over time that makes them more effective entrepreneurs. For instance, they may develop heuristics that guide their decision processes that reduce the analysis task needed to assess risks. These types of advantage lead to equal or higher success rates for serial entrepreneurs and a higher likelihood of sticking to entrepreneurship as a career choice. Serial entrepreneurship theory starts with the idea that entrepreneurs need to decide wh

Hybrid Entrepreneurship

Image
Most entrepreneurs work for organizations before or while they start their businesses. There is macho entrepreneurship dogma that says you have to go all in, experience "the fear" and dedicate yourself for 80 hours a week to your venture. Implicit in this is the notion that an entrepreneur cannot succeed if they hedge their bets by keeping one foot in employment. But isn't this a bad assumption? Why go all in to a startup if startup success stories are probabilistic events, not givens?    Hybrid entrepreneurship refers to entrepreneurship whereby an employee starts a business on the side and keeps their stable and sustaining day job until the startup reaches a certain size. Ardianti et al. (2022) suggests that hybrid entrepreneurs experience a distinct psychological well-being than other entrepreneurs, perhaps because they are keeping their foot in the door of stability. Once the business is large enough to command the founder's full attention, then the emp

Lean launchpad and entrepreneurship

Image
What is the Lean Launchpad? The Lean Launchpad was developed by Steve Blank (serial entrepreneurs and adjunct professor at Stanford) and colleagues as a repeatable process to create a startup. It is probably the most popular methodology today, featuring in a great number of entrepreneurship programs for students and mature students. It is also the method used at Y-Combinator and other top incubator programs. Despite its popularity, there is little empirical research examining the method. Assumptions behind the Lean Launchpad The theory behind the Lean Launchpad can be described as a discovery theory. The entrepreneurship literature is divided about the nature of entrepreneurial opportunities. At one end of the spectrum is the creationist school that views entrepreneurship as a process of opportunity creation led by teams and individuals (McMullen and Dimov, 2013). At the opposite end of the spectrum, the discovery school defends an objective view of entrepreneurship where opportu

(Employee) spinout company versus (corporate) spinoff company: What's the difference?

Image
There exists much confusion about the difference between "employee spinouts" and "corporate spinoffs". It is due to the ambiguous use of these terms both in practice and in academia (Yeganegi et al., 2024).    The following is an attempt to differentiate these phenomena based on who enjoys ownership benefits. At a basic level, spinouts involve employees that turn into entrepreneurs that launch startups, whereas spinoffs are corporate divisions/units turned independent companies.   An Employee spinout ("spinout") is the outcome of the independent decisions of employees that leave their employment to start a new venture or company (i.e., employees-turned-entrepreneurs). Neither the parent organizations nor their investors typically receive any ownership shares in a spinout (although they may sometimes take a small equity stake in exchange for IP rights). Spinouts are owned and controlled by former employees and their own investors (e.g., venture capitalists

Experiential Learning and Entrepreneurship

Image
Learning involves the transformation of experience into potential knowledge, cognition, behaviours or actions (Kolb, 1984). Experiential learning can be differentiated from rationalist (e.g., cognitive theories).  Rather than emphasize the role of acquiring, manipulating, and recalling, experiential learning theory embraces subjective experience.  Know-how   The concept of subjective experience is often used to describe personal and individual experiences that cannot be fully captured or understood through objective observation or measurement. While there are many different types of subjective experiences, one useful way to think about them is through the lens of "know-how." Unlike knowledge, which can be learned through language and formal education, know-how is often acquired through hands-on experience and practice. This type of experiential learning is particularly important in areas like entrepreneurship, where success often depends on a deep understanding of the pr

Stages theory of entrepreneurship

Image
    The entrepreneurial process is often conceptualized as stage-based or as a life cycle. These theories are borrowed from biology where life cycles of flora and fauna are studied extensively. Thus, perhaps it is alright to think of this borrowing as a kind of analogy - imperfect, but potentially interesting. In ecology and biology, there are stages of development or decay present in many phenomena. These theories start with the assumptions of birth, growth, maturity and decline. The description, explanation and prediction of cycles is one of the mainstays of the hard sciences. By definition a life has a beginning and an end, which provides initial boundary conditions for the theory. What happens in between, or those inner-transitions, are where we are going to find most of the action in terms of debate. Kazanjian and Drazin (1990) suggest four stages to explain how an entrepreneurial opportunity becomes a business. They propose that the drivers and resistors of entrepreneurship are d

Harvard School Theory of Entrerpeneurship

Image
This one is a bit of a stretch to call a theory, but we can perhaps think of it as a process theory or a discovery theory . Pradhan and Nath (2011) discuss the Harvard School Theory of entrepreneurship. They say the theory views entrepreneurship as involving "all such activities that initiates, maintains and results in a profit oriented enterprise for production or distribution of economic goods or services and which is consistent with internal and external forces." According to Mohanty (2005) , the Harvard School Theory is a framework for strategic analysis and decision-making that is widely used in the field of entrepreneurship. It involves a thorough internal analysis of the organization's resources and capabilities, as well as an external analysis of the broader business environment. The internal analysis focuses on identifying the organization's strengths and weaknesses, as well as any opportunities and threats that may arise from the external environment. T

Emancipation and Entrepreneurship

Image
The term emancipation has roots in Roman era practices of buying, selling and keeping slaves, but also wives and children. In Roman times, a son needed to be freed from the legal authority of the father to make his own way in the world. The term is also associated Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, which, in the U.S., was used to criminalize slavery. In the women’s liberation movement, emancipation is associated with breaking free from bonds of marriage to a man. In a very interesting paper, Rindova and associates (2009) propose that entrepreneurship can be thought of as means of emancipation. They take a positive spin on a critical theory perspective. They define entrepreneuring as efforts to create new economic, social, institutional and cultural environments via the actions of groups or individuals. To bolster their arguments, they point out three key way in which entrepreneuring resembles emancipation processes. These are seeking autonomy, authoring, and making declarations.

Bricolage Theory

Image
Bricolage theory is credited to Levi-Strauss (1962) who was a French anthropologist who introduced the concept of bricolage entrepreneurship as he tried to show that indigenous peoples were just as entrepreneurial as “civilized” peoples. He compared the “bricoleur” to the “engineer” in his book unfortunately entitled The Savage Mind . Unlike the engineer, the bricoleur “makes do” with the inputs "at hand" to concoct whatever process needed to accomplish a particular project as it develops. By contrast, the engineer plans ahead, gains access to all that is needed to complete a project before starting. Thus, the bricoleur is seen as contrasting with the rational view as projects are accomplished by solving problems as they emerge, with whatever is available rather than what is really needed. The bricoleur practices radical experimentation rather than planning ahead. Bricolage theory is mainly focused on explaining how entrepreneurship emerges in economically depressed,

Effectuation Theory of Entrepreneurship

Image
What is the effectuation theory of entrepreneurship? Dr. Saras Sarasvathy is an Indian born business school professor researching strategy, entrepreneurship and business ethics, currently appointed at the University of Virginia. Sarasvathy proposed the theory of effectuation in the early 2000s after studying a sample of expert entrepreneurs with diverse backgrounds. Effectuation theory is often considered a process theory because it explains the process that entrepreneurs use to create new ventures. Effectuation theory stems from the way that expert entrepreneurs think about problems and how they go about solving them. Effectuation logic contrasts with what Sarasvathy calls "causation theories" of entrepreneurship, where it is proposed that entrepreneurs start with a goal and then acquire the resources needed to achieve the goal, in a linear fashion. Each resource acquisition is a step toward the goal. In stark contrast, effectuation logic involves evaluating resourc